Name two different methods for evaluating evidence. Compare and contrast these two methods.

Solution:

Evaluating evidence particularly medical related literatures is a substantially complex process. It is therefore crucial for researchers to acquire a comprehensive understanding regarding the study techniques, the study’s reliability and validity. Through this, it becomes possible to ensure that evidence presented is valid as well as reliable.  As there are a plethora of evidence evaluation methodologies, one ought to employ optimal methods for productive evaluation. Systematic review and meta-analysis evidence evaluation methodologies are highly useful in delivering valid and reliable evidence evaluation. Gough, Oliver, and Thomas (2017) state that systematic reviews produce answers to a systematized set of study question through collection and summarization of practical evidences that are in accordance with the pre-defined and prescribed eligibility criteria….Please click the icon below to purchase full solution at $5