Question 1
Question | The two main criteria that the National Science Foundation (NSF) uses to evaluate grant proposals are: |
Your Answer | Intellectual merit and broader impact. |
Result | Correct |
Comment | The two main criteria used by NSF to evaluate a grant proposal are the intellectual merit and broader impacts of the proposal. |
Question 2
Question | A reviewer’s main responsibility is to: |
Your Answer | Behave professionally. |
Result | Correct |
Comment | A reviewer’s main responsibility is to behave professionally. A reviewer should avoid personal attacks but does not necessarily have to be friendly or avoid criticizing the content of the manuscript. |
Question 3
Question | The main reason that grant proposal reviewers with a conflict of interest should remove themselves from the review process is because: |
Your Answer | Their removal lessens the chance that bias will affect the review process. |
Result | Correct |
Comment | A conflict of interest may bias the review process. It could cause a reviewer to reject or endorse a grant proposal in an unfair manner. |
Question 4
Question | Which of the following statements most accurately describes the review process for grant proposals? |
Your Answer | Funding agencies usually have committees, often with external reviewers, that assess the quality of the proposal. |
Result | Correct |
Comment | Funding agencies usually have committees to review the quality of the proposals received. The review process is not always the same from one federal agency to the next. |
Question 5
Question | Reviewers have a responsibility to promote ethical peer review by: |
Your Answer | Preserving the confidentiality of the submission. |
Result | Correct |
Comment | Authors of a paper or a grant proposal expect that their valued original information is respected and confidentiality preserved in order to attain the credit for their hard work. |