Total Points Possible: 200 Points

Preparation and Paper Outline:

1. PART 1: The medical application selection for this assignment is contingent upon the month of your birthday. Use the table below to identify the Medical App for this assignment.

• Use the Google Play Storefor Android devices or the Apple iTunes App Store for Apple devices to search for the medical application as determined by the table above.
• In order to complete the following guided appraisal, download the appto a mobile device (smartphone or tablet). The apps are free and do not require purchase to complete this assignment.
• Provide proof of downloadby attaching a screenshot of the device screen in JPEG or PDF format to the assignment upload tab (in addition to submitting this assignment). Following the general instructions below for smartphone devices (specific device instructions may vary):
  • Android 4.0 and Newer: (Galaxy SIII, Galaxy S 4, Galaxy Note, HTC One, Nexus phones, Droid phones)
    • Any Android phone running Ice Cream Sandwich (4.0) or later can easily take a screenshot. Hold the Power and Volume Down buttons together until the screen flashes and you hear the shutter sound. The screenshot image will appear in your Gallery app, usually inside the Screenshots folder
  • iPhone
    • The method for taking a screenshot in iOS has been the same since version 2.0. Hold the Power (Sleep/Wake)and Home buttons together until the screen flashes and you hear the shutter sound. The screenshot image will appear in your Photosapp under Camera Roll.

2. PART 2: Answer the Medical App Critical Appraisal questions thoughtfully and comprehensively. Use the criteria headings on this outline as the headings on your properly APA- formatted paper.
   • NAME: What is the name of the app?
   • AUTHOR: Who created, developed, or maintains the app? Explain.
   • ENDORSEMENT: Is the app licensed by the Food and Drug Administration, other government agency, or endorsed by an academic institution or medical professional organization? Explain.
   • OPERATION: Which platform (mobile or web-based) is suitable for the app and why?
   • AESTHETICS: Is the information displayed in a way that is easy to navigate? Is it easy to use? Can you use it without instructions? Explain.
   • PURPOSE: What is the intended purpose or use of the app?
   • CLINICAL DECISION MAKING: What influence does the app have on clinical decision making? Explain.
   • SAFETY: Is there potential for patient harm? Explain.
   • PRIVACY/SECURITY: Does the app have privacy statement or setting? Is there a clear privacy policy stating information will be encrypted and not shared with third parties? Does the app share information on social networks? Are users notified in the event of a breach of privacy and health information? Explain.
   • USER: For whom is the app intended (providers, patients, or others)? Explain.
   • DISTRIBUTION: Is it designed for local use or wider distribution? Explain.
   • CREDIBILITY: How credible are the sources of information? How do you know? Explain.
   • RELEVANCE: How current is the information in the app? When was the last update? Is the content consistent with evidence-based literature or best practices/standards of care? Explain.
3. PART 3: Provide oneexample of an appropriate patient or clinical scenario for this app. The example should include the following details:
   • Patient Age-population (Pediatric, Adult, Geriatric)
   • Clinical Setting (Hospital, Private Practice, Extended Living Facility)
   • History of Present Illness and Diagnosis or Condition
   • Provide a detailed description of the app in your example. When will the app be implemented (at the Point-of-care or elsewhere)? Who will use the app? What potential impact will it have on the scenario? Incorporate the critical appraisal information from Part 2. Provide one evidence-based scholarly article as a reference to support clinical decision making.
4. This assignment will be graded on the quality of the information, inclusion of one evidence-based scholarly resource, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, and organization based on the required components (see the paper headings and content details in Part 1).
5. The length of the paper is to be between 1,000 and 1,500 words, excluding title page and reference list.
6. Create this assignment using Microsoft (MS) Word. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx.”
7. APA format is required in this assignment, explicitly for in-text citations and the reference list. Use 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins and double spacing. See the APA manual for details regarding proper citation. See resources under Course Resources, “Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers” for further clarification.

* Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal.  You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article.  The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs.  These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality.  For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality.  It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site.  Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years.  Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.

Solution: AIDSinfo

Medical Application Critical Appraisal

Over the past couple of years, the number of mobile applications on the App Store and Google play has increased consistently. The number of health-related apps has also been on the rise. This has resulted in distress as well as frustration among the providers in their attempt to differentiate a reliable application that can be used at the point of care. The key concerns among the providers are the liability that comes with the use of the app, availability of up-to-date information, and user-friendly app (Fiore, 2017). This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of a health-related app, the AIDSinfo to confirm its reliability and usefulness in healthcare.

Name:

AIDSinfo

Author:

This app was launched in 2016 by the National Library of Medicine. It is maintained by the same developer

Endorsement:

This application has endorsed by credible organizations. For instance, the Centers for Disease Control and prevention, the office of AIDS Research as well as the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The rationale for identifying the agencies endorsing the health-related application is that it helps the users to understand the reliability of the application and credibility (Golden, & Krauskopf, 2016). These organizations mentioned above are government-related agencies, which are credible hence the credibility of the app.Please click the icon below to purchase full solution at $10