NURS 6630 week 10 Assignment 2: SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PATIENT POPULATIONS PAPER

Rubric

NURS_6630_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric
NURS_6630_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Describes the selected mediation and explains the selection, dosing, and necessary patient education.

20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent
The response comprehensively and clearly describes the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection, dosing, and patient education information.

18 to >15.0 pts

Good
The response clearly describes the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection, dosing, and patient education information.

15 to >10.0 pts

Fair
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection, dosing, and patient education information.

10 to >0 pts

Poor
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that does not describe the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information, or some or all are missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the selection, dosing, and patient education information, or it is missing.
20 pts
Describes any necessary labs or diagnostics needed prior to prescribing, as well as how side effects and efficacy will be monitored.

20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent
The response comprehensively and clearly describes needed labs and other diagnostics. The response comprehensively and clearly describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the descriptions.

18 to >15.0 pts

Good
The response clearly describes needed labs and other diagnostics. The response clearly describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the descriptions.

15 to >10.0 pts

Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes needed labs and other diagnostics. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the descriptions.

10 to >0 pts

Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes needed labs and other diagnostics, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the descriptions, or it is missing.
20 pts
20

Explains why the other medications are not appropriate

20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent
The response comprehensively and fully details why other medications are not appropriate. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation.

18 to >15.0 pts

Good
The response clearly details why other medications are not appropriate. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanation.

15 to >10.0 pts

Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely details why other medications are not appropriate. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanation.

10 to >0 pts

Poor
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support why other medications are not appropriate, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanation, or it is missing.
20 pts
Provides any additional collaboration or education necessary for the patient

20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent
The response accurately and clearly provides all additional necessary information. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples the information.

18 to >15.0 pts

Good
The response accurately provides all additional necessary information. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the information.

15 to >10.0 pts

Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely provides all additional necessary information. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the information.

10 to >0 pts

Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely provides all additional necessary information, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the information, or it is missing.
20 pts
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. Writes succinctly 4–5 page paper.

10 to >7.0 pts

Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided, which delineates all required criteria. Writes succinctly 4–5 page paper.

7 to >4.0 pts

Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the Assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. Writes succinctly 4–7 page paper.

4 to >1.0 pts

Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the Assignment is vague or off topic. Writes succinctly 8–9 page paper.

1 to >0 pts

Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Does not write succinctly 10+ page paper.
10 pts
5

Written Expression and Formatting—English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Contains a one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair
Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

1 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
5

Written Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Contains a one or two APA format errors.

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair
Contains three or four APA format errors.

1 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains five or more APA format errors.
5 pts
Total Points: 100

This function has been disabled for Chartered Tutorials.

error: Content is protected !!
× How can I help you?